Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the dealer declined to compound the alleged offence, the goods detained under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could still be released on payment of tax alone under section 42(3), and whether any direction for release could be issued in the writ proceedings.
Analysis: The detention arose from alleged contravention of the record-carrying and transport requirements under sections 40(3), 44 and the penal provisions in section 45 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Section 42(3) permits release where the sale or purchase is properly accounted for and, where tax is payable, on payment of tax or furnishing of security. However, once the prescribed authority invokes section 46 and offers compounding, refusal to compound leads to prosecution. In that situation, the goods form part of the property involved in the offence and their custody and disposal fall within the control of the Magistrate before whom the prosecution is launched. Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was referred to only to explain that the criminal court can regulate custody and disposal pending trial.
Conclusion: The dealer was not entitled to insist on release of the goods by payment of tax alone after refusing compounding and facing prosecution. Any request for release had to be made before the Magistrate, and no relief was available in the proceedings.