Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner's clarification permitting purchase of iron ore lumps against form 37 under section 5-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was binding on the assessing authority.
Analysis: The clarification had been issued generally, had wide publicity, and was not shown to be merely a private communication. The Court relied on settled Supreme Court authority that a departmental circular or instruction, though not binding on the assessee or the court, binds the revenue administration so long as it remains in force. An assessing officer cannot adopt a view contrary to the departmental interpretation, particularly where the goods in question were used as raw material in manufacture. Since the lumps were used in the manufacture of pig iron and cast iron, the clarification fell within the scope of section 5-A and was required to be given effect to.
Conclusion: The clarification was binding on the assessing authority and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of form 37 under section 5-A.
Ratio Decidendi: A departmental clarification or circular, when generally issued and in force, binds the assessing authority and cannot be disregarded by the revenue, even though it remains open to challenge by the assessee.