Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings for assessment under section 18(6)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 were initiated within twelve months from the date of completion of proceedings under section 4-A(1), and whether the assessment and revisional orders were therefore barred by limitation.
Analysis: The notice in form XVI dated 12 January 1989 was treated as the first initiation of proceedings under section 18(6)(a). The date of completion of proceedings under section 4-A(1) was 16 July 1987. On the record, no earlier notice or order sheet was produced to show initiation within twelve months. The period prescribed in section 18(6)(a) governs initiation of proceedings, while section 18(8) deals with a different limitation scheme for completion of assessments and did not cure the delay in commencement.
Conclusion: The proceedings under section 18(6)(a) were initiated beyond the prescribed twelve months and were barred by limitation.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute requires assessment proceedings to be initiated within a fixed period from completion of proceedings under an earlier provision, commencement beyond that period is invalid and the resulting assessment is barred by limitation, irrespective of a separate limitation period for completion of assessment.