Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PVC fittings such as elbows, tees and couplings were classifiable under the entry relating to plastics and articles of plastics or under the entry relating to water supply and sanitary equipments and fittings, and whether the Tribunal's factual finding on use could be interfered with in proceedings under section 41.
Analysis: The expression "sanitary fittings" was taken in its popular sense and was held to cover only pipes or materials used in lavatories, urinals or bathrooms, or articles fixed or attached to a building as part of it or auxiliary to it. Pipes laid underground for carrying water supply were held not to fall within that expression. The materials on record did not establish that the PVC fittings were used as water supply and sanitary fittings, and it was also noticed that PVC pipes have diverse uses beyond water supply or sanitary purposes. Since the Tribunal had recorded a factual finding against the Revenue on the absence of evidence of such use, that finding was not open to challenge in proceedings under section 41.
Conclusion: The PVC fittings were correctly held to fall under the plastics entry and not under the water supply and sanitary fittings entry. The Revenue's challenge failed.