2000 (3) TMI 1055 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Court rules sales tax cannot be levied on bricks used in works contracts pre-1984 amendment. Incorrect assessment orders set aside.

RL. Roy and Others Versus State of Tripura and Others

The court ruled in Civil Rule Nos. 49, 50, and 51 of 1991 that sales tax could not be levied on bricks used in works contracts before the 1984 amendment ... - Issues:Levy of sales tax on bricks used in works contract prior to amendment of Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 in 1984.Analysis:The judgment in Civil Rule Nos. 49, 50, and 51 of 1991 addresses the issue of whether sales tax can be levied on bricks manufactured and used in works contracts before the 1984 amendment of the Tripura Sales Tax Act. The petitioner-firm executed consolidated contract works for road improvement using self-manufactured bricks. The assessing authority misinterpreted the law and raised tax demands, which were confirmed by higher tax authorities. The key question was whether the bricks used in works contracts constituted a sale for tax purposes. The court referred to relevant Supreme Court and High Court decisions to analyze the nature of works contracts and the applicability of sales tax.The court cited the Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. case, where it was established that a contract for works does not become a sale merely because property passes during the contract. Additionally, the Builders Association of India case upheld the levy of sales tax on goods involved in works contracts. The court also referenced the Sailesh Chandra Nandi case, where it was held that no tax could be levied on materials used in works contracts that did not involve a sale within the state. Applying these precedents, the court determined that the bricks used in road improvement works did not constitute a sale under the Tripura Sales Tax Act before the 1984 amendment.The court concluded that prior to the 1984 amendment, the materials used in works contracts, including the bricks in question, were not taxable under the law. The assessment orders were deemed incorrect, and the decisions of the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes and the Tripura Sales Tax Tribunal were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the Superintendent of Taxes for reassessment in line with the court's decision. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs imposed on either party.