Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of pledged goods by the court auctioneer gave rise to liability to sales tax under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of the transaction. The goods had been pledged and were sold through court auction machinery for recovery of the secured amount. The governing principle applied was that a pledgee's sale is an exercise of the statutory power of sale under the Contract Act and does not alter the juridical character of the transaction so as to fasten sales tax liability in the manner asserted by the revenue authorities. The court, on the facts, accepted the petitioner's contention that the amount recovered from the auction purchaser could not be retained as sales tax.
Conclusion: The petitioner's challenge succeeded, and the demand/recovery of sales tax on the auction sale could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The refund application was allowed and the revision petition was disposed of in favour of the petitioner, without costs.