Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether grinding lime shell into shell grit resulted in manufacture of a new and distinct commodity so as to attract purchase tax under section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and justify deletion of the turnover.
Analysis: The turnover arose from purchase of lime shell without supporting bills, which was later converted into shell grit used as poultry feed. The Tribunal had treated the process as mere grinding and held that the original lime shell and the resultant shell grit were the same commodity. The Court applied the commercial parlance test and the principle that a commodity is manufactured when processing brings into existence a new and distinct product that is no longer regarded as the original commodity. It found that lime shell could not be used as poultry feed in its original form, whereas shell grit could be so used, and therefore the resultant product had a different commercial identity. On that basis, the conversion was treated as consumption of the original goods in the manufacture of other goods.
Conclusion: The conversion of lime shell into shell grit amounted to manufacture of a different commodity, section 7-A was attracted, and the deletion of the turnover was incorrect.