Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1999 (5) TMI 18 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court affirms settlement as genuine, allows deduction under mercantile accounting. The court affirmed the Tribunal's findings that the settlement of Rs. 10 lakhs between Todi Tea Co. Ltd. and Taurus Foundry Pvt. Ltd. was genuine, with ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court affirms settlement as genuine, allows deduction under mercantile accounting.

                          The court affirmed the Tribunal's findings that the settlement of Rs. 10 lakhs between Todi Tea Co. Ltd. and Taurus Foundry Pvt. Ltd. was genuine, with the liability admitted and paid by the assessee. The court also upheld the Tribunal's decision that the assessee's move to set aside the arbitrator's award for the balance amount of Rs. 7,00,000 was supported by material evidence. Additionally, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 10 lakhs in the assessment year 1984-85, in accordance with the mercantile system of accounting.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the finding of the Tribunal regarding the settlement of Rs. 10 lakhs is based on any material or perverse.
                          2. Whether the Tribunal's finding about the assessee moving the High Court to set aside the arbitrator's award is based on any material or perverse.
                          3. Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in allowing Rs. 10 lakhs as an allowable deduction in the assessment year 1984-85.

                          Summary of Judgment:

                          Issue 1: Settlement of Rs. 10 Lakhs
                          The Tribunal found that the assessee, Todi Tea Co. Ltd., had entered into a contract with Taurus Foundry Pvt. Ltd. and failed to supply the agreed quantity of tea, leading to a compensation claim of Rs. 30 lakhs by Taurus. The arbitrator awarded Rs. 17 lakhs, but the matter was settled out of court for Rs. 10 lakhs. The Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) concurred that the transaction was genuine and the liability of Rs. 10 lakhs was admitted and paid by the assessee. The court found no justification to interfere with this finding, affirming that the settlement was genuine and the liability was admitted.

                          Issue 2: Setting Aside Arbitrator's Award
                          The Tribunal's finding that the assessee moved the Calcutta High Court to set aside the arbitrator's award concerning the balance amount of Rs. 7,00,000 was supported by the memorandum of settlement dated March 26, 1984. The settlement stated that Taurus Foundry Pvt. Ltd. would not insist on the payment of the balance sum, and the assessee would apply to the court to set aside the award for the balance amount. The court found this finding to be based on material evidence and not perverse.

                          Issue 3: Allowable Deduction of Rs. 10 Lakhs
                          The court considered whether the Rs. 10 lakhs liability could be allowed as a deduction in the assessment year 1984-85. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and the liability was admitted and created in the books during the relevant year. The court referenced CIT v. Shewbux Jahurilal [1962] 46 ITR 688, which supports the allowance of admitted liabilities in the year they are created under the mercantile system. The court affirmed that the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) were justified in allowing the deduction of Rs. 10 lakhs in the assessment year 1984-85.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court answered:
                          - Question 1: Misconceived as there was no finding by the Tribunal on March 14, 1984, regarding the full and final settlement.
                          - Question 2: The finding was not perverse and was based on material evidence.
                          - Question 3: Affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, allowing the deduction of Rs. 10 lakhs in the assessment year 1984-85.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found