Sales tax classification of ayurvedic products turns on commercial and medicinal character, not cosmetic use, in product-entry disputes.

Vicco Vajradanti and Vicco Turmeric Vanishing Cream were treated as ayurvedic medicines for sales tax classification because their manufacture under an ayurvedic drug licence, certification by the drugs authority, technical material, expert opinion, and market recognition showed a medicinal identity. The presence of entries for toothpaste, tooth powder, and cosmetics did not displace that classification where the goods were not shown to be mere toilet articles or cosmetics. The commercial and medicinal character of the products, rather than their form of use, was the decisive factor, and the Tribunal's classification was upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether vicco vajradanti and vicco turmeric vanishing cream were classifiable as ayurvedic medicines under the relevant entry of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. (ii) Whether the specific entries for tooth paste, tooth powder and cosmetics displaced classification of those products as ayurvedic medicines.

Issue (i): Whether vicco vajradanti and vicco turmeric vanishing cream were classifiable as ayurvedic medicines under the relevant entry of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis: The products were manufactured under an ayurvedic drug licence, were certified as ayurvedic medicines by the competent drugs authority, and were supported by technical material, expert opinion and market understanding. The Tribunal's finding was also consistent with the view taken in similar classification disputes that the real character of the product depends on its preparation, label, literature, and commercial recognition, and not merely on the form in which it is used.

Conclusion: The products were correctly held to be ayurvedic medicines and not cosmetic or toilet preparations.

Issue (ii): Whether the specific entries for tooth paste, tooth powder and cosmetics displaced classification of those products as ayurvedic medicines.

Analysis: Although specific entries ordinarily prevail over a general entry, that principle did not assist the Revenue because the Tribunal found that the products were sold and understood in the market as ayurvedic medicines, and the materials on record did not show them to be mere toilet articles or cosmetics. The existence of a specific entry for tooth paste or cosmetics did not alter the character of the goods when their accepted commercial identity was medicinal.

Conclusion: The specific entries did not apply, and the goods remained within the ayurvedic medicine entry.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Tribunal was upheld, and the revisions filed by the Revenue failed.

Ratio Decidendi: For sales tax classification, the true commercial and medicinal character of a product, as shown by manufacture, licence, label, authoritative certification and market understanding, prevails over its cosmetic or toiletry use, and a specific entry will not apply where the goods are established to be ayurvedic medicines.

---