Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product "Swad" tablets was an ayurvedic medicine or a confectionery article for the purpose of sales tax classification and whether it was liable to tax at the residuary rate instead of the concessional rate applicable to medicines.
Analysis: The product had to be judged by its true character in common parlance, with reference to its constituents, use, and market acceptance, and not merely by the description used by the manufacturer or by licences obtained under other enactments. The evidence showed that the tablets were not manufactured strictly in accordance with the authoritative Ayurvedic formula, but were prepared by evolving a formula of the manufacturer's own after taking ingredients from Ayurvedic texts with modifications. The Court also found that there was no reliable evidence of product literature, medical recommendation, trade acceptance as medicine, or clinical trials to establish curative value. The claim that the product was sugar was rejected, and the statutory and tariff materials relied upon did not assist the assessee in establishing exemption or medicinal classification.
Conclusion: "Swad" tablets were held not to be an ayurvedic medicine but a confectionery article, and the tax authorities were justified in levying tax at the residuary rate.
Ratio Decidendi: In fiscal classification, the true nature of a product is determined by its common parlance character, constituents, and actual use, and not by labels, licences, or claimed medicinal description where the evidence does not establish that it is a medicine.