Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sheep hair falls within the expression "wool" in item 41 of the Schedule to the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, and is therefore an "agricultural produce" under section 2(a) of the Act.
Analysis: The expression "agricultural produce" under section 2(a) applies only to produce specified in the Schedule, and section 38 permits addition, omission, or amendment of items in that Schedule. Item 41 uses the words "wool (oon)", while items 75 and 76 separately mention goat hair and camel hair. The Court applied the settled principle that words in a fiscal or trade-related schedule must be construed in their trade or common parlance sense, not in a technical or dictionary sense, unless the statute indicates otherwise. On that basis, "wool" in item 41 was understood as sheep hair in the popular and trade sense, and the separate inclusion of goat hair and camel hair supported that construction.
Conclusion: Sheep hair falls within item 41 of the Schedule as "wool (oon)" and is an agricultural produce under the Act; the writ petitions were therefore devoid of merit.