Substantial compliance in sales tax payment led to quashing of interest and penalty for a short cheque-payment delay.

A dealer who filed returns on time and deposited sales tax by cheque within 30 days of the quarter-end, though beyond the 20-day period for cheque payments, was found to have substantially complied with the Punjab General Sales Tax framework. Section 10(4) and rule 20 were read as requiring timely payment, but the short delay had to be assessed with surrounding circumstances rather than by a mechanical resort to sections 10(6) and 11D. Because the authority did not examine the explanation for delay or the dealer's conduct, the imposition of interest and penalty was held unjustified and the orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether interest and penalty could be sustained under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 for deposit of sales tax by cheque after 20 days from the end of the quarter but within 30 days, where the dealer had filed returns within time and the delay was only of 7 to 8 days.

Analysis: Section 10(4) required a registered dealer, before furnishing returns, to pay the tax due into the Government treasury, the Reserve Bank of India, or the District Excise and Taxation Office, and rule 20 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Rules, 1949 prescribed two different periods: 30 days from the end of the quarter for cash payment and 20 days where payment was by cheque or bank draft. The dealer had deposited the amounts within 30 days, and the Court treated the delay beyond 20 days as a small delay requiring consideration of the surrounding circumstances. The assessing authority proceeded mechanically under sections 10(6) and 11D without examining the reason for the delay and without applying its mind to whether the conduct warranted penal action. On the facts, the Court held that the dealer had substantially complied with the law and that the extreme technical approach adopted had resulted in arbitrary and unjust harassment.

Conclusion: Interest and penalty were not leviable on the facts, and the orders imposing them were quashed in favour of the assessee.

---