Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand raised by the industrial corporation for alleged excess availing of sales tax exemption under the package scheme was valid, and whether the amount recovered pursuant to that demand was liable to be refunded.
Analysis: The eligibility certificate and certificate of entitlement granted the unit exemption benefits under the 1979 Package Scheme up to the prescribed ceiling. The notional sales tax liability, which was the basis for monitoring the ceiling, had been certified by the Sales Tax Officer and was not disputed. The corporation nevertheless proceeded on an incorrect computation of the exemption limit and demanded repayment with interest, without substantiating the demand. The scheme, the entitlement certificate, and the statutory exemption entry under the sales tax law governed the extent of benefit, and the demand made on a mistaken and unsupported calculation could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The demand for alleged excess exemption was invalid and liable to be quashed, and the amount collected under that demand was refundable to the petitioners.
Final Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to relief against the impugned demand, with consequential refund and costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand for repayment of incentive benefits under a tax exemption scheme cannot be sustained when it is founded on an incorrect computation of the statutory and scheme-based ceiling and is unsupported by justification.