Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Commercial Taxes Officer of the Intelligence Branch had jurisdiction to impose penalty for the disputed periods under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 and the earlier Bihar Sales Tax Ordinance, 1976.
Analysis: Section 51 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, and the corresponding provision in the Bihar Sales Tax Ordinance, 1976, were held to be enabling rather than disabling. They were intended to confer additional powers on members of the Bureau of Investigation who were not otherwise taxing authorities, and not to take away powers already vested in officers who were taxing authorities under section 9. The Commercial Taxes Officer in question was a taxing authority within section 9, was covered by the territorial notification issued under the Ordinance, and was also a prescribed authority under rule 15 for purposes including sections 19 and 20. The absence of a separate authorisation under section 51 did not deprive him of jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The officer had jurisdiction to pass the penalty order, and the reference was answered in favour of the revenue.
Final Conclusion: The challenged penalty order was upheld in law on the jurisdictional issue referred to the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory provision constituting an investigation bureau is enabling in nature and does not curtail the independent powers of an officer who is already a taxing authority and prescribed authority under the governing fiscal statute and rules.