Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 139(8) and interest under sections 215/217 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could both be levied, and whether the Settlement Commission erred in treating the assessee's later petition as one for review rather than correction.
Analysis: Interest under section 139(8) is compensatory for delay in filing the return, while interest under section 215 is compensatory for default in payment of advance tax. The two provisions operate on different defaults and there was no legal bar to levy of both where the facts justified it. The Commission had no power to review its own order, and the later petition was considered on merits as well, so no prejudice was shown in not treating it as a mere correction application.
Conclusion: The challenge to the levy of interest and to the manner in which the subsequent petition was dealt with failed.