Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed turnover represented inter-State sales exigible to tax in Tamil Nadu under section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: Inter-State sale under section 3(a) arises only where the sale or purchase occasions movement of goods from one State to another, and the movement must be the result of the contract of sale. On the facts, the assessee's own books treated the disputed turnover as its sales, the orders were placed through the Madras office, the goods were moved from Chennai to Nellore and Chittoor pursuant to those contracts, and the material did not establish that the turnover represented independent local sales in Andhra Pradesh. The prior Andhra Pradesh proceedings were not treated as for the present turnover and assessment year. The facts were held to be in substance similar to the earlier Madras decision relied upon by the Revenue.
Conclusion: The turnover was rightly held to be inter-State sales taxable in Tamil Nadu, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a sale contract through the assessee's office causes the movement of goods from one State to another, the transaction is an inter-State sale taxable under section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, notwithstanding assertions of local sales in another State.