Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer deemed to be a registered dealer under section 7(4) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 could be treated as a registered dealer under the M.P. Entry Tax Act although section 7 of the Sales Tax Act was not expressly adopted by section 13 of the Entry Tax Act.
Analysis: Section 13 of the Entry Tax Act applied only the specified provisions of the Sales Tax Act mutatis mutandis, and section 7 was deliberately omitted from that list. The deeming provision in section 7(4) was created for the limited purpose of making the machinery provisions of that Act applicable to purchasers liable under section 7, and such a legal fiction cannot be extended beyond its statutory context. The two enactments rested on different constitutional entries, and the omission of section 7 from section 13 showed that the Legislature did not intend the purchase-tax machinery or the deeming of registered dealer status to operate under the Entry Tax Act.
Conclusion: The dealer could not be deemed to be a registered dealer under the Entry Tax Act on the basis of section 7(4) of the Sales Tax Act.
Final Conclusion: The legal fiction of deemed registration was confined to the Sales Tax Act and could not be carried into the Entry Tax Act in the absence of express adoption.
Ratio Decidendi: A deeming provision must be confined to the purpose and context for which it is created and cannot be extended by implication to a different statute where the Legislature has not expressly adopted it.