Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of machinery effected after cessation of production, claimed as closure of business, was a sale in the course of business and liable to tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The reference turned on the scope of the definition of "business" under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The amendment made by Maharashtra Act No. 9 of 1988 expanded the definition to include transactions in connection with, incidental to, or ancillary to the commencement or closure of trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern. The amendment was given retrospective effect only from July 1, 1981. In view of that cut-off date, the Revenue fairly did not press a contention that the amended definition should be applied to earlier transactions.
Conclusion: The sale of machinery effected on January 10, 1979, after cessation of production, was not liable to tax as a transaction in the course of business. The question was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee.