Natural justice in reopening tax assessments requires full disclosure of relied-on material and a fair hearing before action stands.

A reopening of deemed sales tax assessments was held unsustainable where the material relied on was not fully disclosed and the affected party was denied a fair opportunity to meet it. The Tribunal also noted that transactions under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 should not be mixed at the reopening stage; the inquiry must first be confined to material relevant to reopening, with any turnover adjustment considered later at assessment if required. It further found that two distinct assessment periods could not be clubbed together without basis. The reopening orders and consequential notices were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after disclosure and hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the reassessment orders were vitiated for non-disclosure of the material relied upon and breach of natural justice; (ii) whether transactions under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could be mixed at the stage of deciding whether deemed assessments should be reopened; (iii) whether the two assessment periods ending 31 March 1991 and 31 March 1992 could be clubbed together.

Issue (i): whether the reassessment orders were vitiated for non-disclosure of the material relied upon and breach of natural justice

Analysis: The applicants had been directed to be supplied with the materials forming the basis of the show-cause notices and to be allowed inspection of relevant records. The material from Bombay was not disclosed before the impugned orders were made, and the record also showed that all the relied upon transactions were not properly placed before the applicants. The procedural safeguard earlier directed by the Tribunal was therefore not complied with.

Conclusion: The reassessment orders were vitiated for breach of the principles of natural justice and could not stand.

Issue (ii): whether transactions under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could be mixed at the stage of deciding whether deemed assessments should be reopened

Analysis: While inter-State sales may have relevance at the stage of assessment or fresh assessment, they were not required to be mixed with the inquiry under section 11E(2) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 for deciding whether deemed assessments should be reopened. The proper course was to first decide reopening on the materials relevant to that question, and only thereafter, if fresh assessment became necessary, to consider the turnover adjustments at the assessment stage.

Conclusion: Such mixing of Central Sales Tax transactions with the reopening inquiry was not justified at that stage.

Issue (iii): whether the two assessment periods ending 31 March 1991 and 31 March 1992 could be clubbed together

Analysis: The two periods were distinct, and there was no basis for combining them in the impugned orders. The clubbing of the assessment periods should have been avoided.

Conclusion: The clubbing of the two assessment periods was improper.

Final Conclusion: The impugned reopening orders and consequential notices were set aside, and the matter was sent back for fresh consideration in accordance with law after supplying any further material and granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment or reopening order is unsustainable unless the affected party is given full disclosure of the material relied upon and a fair opportunity to meet it, and the reopening inquiry must be confined to the material relevant to that stage.

---