Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bamboo crates were covered by the entry relating to goods used as containers and packing material under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, prior to 1 October 1978.
Analysis: The expression "that is to say" in the relevant entry was treated as limiting the scope of the listed goods, making the entry exhaustive rather than illustrative. After the amendment with effect from 1 October 1978, the Legislature introduced a definition of "packing material" linked to the goods specified in the entry and also added a power to notify other goods. On that reasoning, goods not specifically enumerated in the entry could not be treated as packing material by implication. For the period prior to 1 October 1978, bamboo crates were not specified in the entry and therefore could not be brought within it merely because they were used for packing.
Conclusion: Bamboo crates were not covered by the packing-material entry prior to 1 October 1978 and fell under the residuary entry; the question was answered in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a sales-tax entry uses the words "that is to say", the enumerated goods constitute an exhaustive class, and items not specifically included cannot be treated as covered except by express notification or legislative amendment.