Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the concessional rate of tax under G.O. Ms. No. 172 was available when asbestos cement sheets were ordered by nationalised banks but delivered directly to their customers for use in constructing poultry sheds and other purposes.
Analysis: The condition in the Government Order required that the goods manufactured in the State be sold to public sector undertakings, Government companies or co-operative societies for their own use or captive consumption. The banks did not receive or take delivery of the goods, and the goods were delivered directly to the customers who actually used them. On those facts, the banks neither used the goods nor consumed them captively. The Tribunal's findings on use and delivery were findings of fact, and no question of law arose from them.
Conclusion: The concessional rate of tax was not admissible, and the assessee's claim failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Concessional sales tax benefit restricted to a purchaser's own use or captive consumption cannot be claimed where the purchaser merely facilitates delivery of goods to third parties who alone use them.