Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received by the refinery from the pool account maintained under the oil pricing scheme formed part of the sale price and taxable turnover, so as to justify levy of sales tax under the relevant taxing statutes.
Analysis: The statutory scheme defined sale price as the money consideration for sale of taxable goods and turnover as the aggregate of sale prices or parts of sale prices. The price of petroleum products was fixed by the Government, and the pool account was created to compensate refineries whose retention price exceeded the controlled sale price. The amount received from the pool account was not an amount paid by the purchaser as consideration for the goods sold, but an adjustment or compensatory payment to offset loss arising from the controlled pricing mechanism. On the settled distinction between consideration for sale and subsidy or compensation, such receipt could not be treated as sale price or turnover. The assessment orders and revisional order therefore lacked jurisdiction to tax that amount.
Conclusion: The amount received from the pool account did not form part of sale price or turnover, and the levy of tax on that amount was unsustainable; the assessee succeeded.