Harmonious construction of entry tax notifications placed specified man-made fibre items outside the levy from inception.

Entry No. 16-B of the Karnataka entry tax law, read with the two notifications issued on 28 October 1986, was construed harmoniously to reflect the legislative intent behind the amendment and conditional assent. Because the amendment and notifications were published together, the exemption for the specified man-made fibre items could not be treated as a later, prospective carve-out in isolation. The excluded items were therefore outside the scope of entry No. 16-B from its inception, and entry tax levied on them for the intervening period was not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether entry No. 16-B of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale Therein Act, 1979, read with the two notifications issued on 28 October 1986, excluded the specified man-made fibre items from the levy from the inception of the entry or only prospectively from the date of the notifications.

Analysis: Entry No. 16-B was inserted with effect from 1 April 1983, but the amending Act and both notifications were published on the same date pursuant to conditional assent. The first notification exempted the specified items, while the second fixed a flat rate for the remaining items covered by entry No. 16-B. Reading the statutory amendment and the notifications together, and applying harmonious construction so as to give effect to legislative intent, the exemption notification could not be treated as merely prospective in isolation. The sequence of the notifications and their simultaneous publication with the amending Act showed that the excluded items were meant to stand outside the entry from the beginning.

Conclusion: The specified items were held to be outside the scope of entry No. 16-B from its inception, and the levy of entry tax on them for the intermediate period was not sustainable.

---