Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the check-post officers had jurisdiction under the Bengal Raw Jute Taxation Act, 1941 to intercept or detain raw jute consignments in transit and levy purchase tax at the check-post, and whether the tax collected was liable to be refunded.
Analysis: The State representative conceded that the Bengal Raw Jute Taxation Act, 1941 did not contain any provision authorising the setting up of check-posts. On that basis, the interception of the consignment and recovery of purchase tax at the check-post were without statutory authority. The materials also supported the applicant's contention that the transactions were in the course of inter-State trade or commerce and were within the statutory exemption.
Conclusion: The check-post officers had no jurisdiction to intercept or detain the consignment or to impose purchase tax at the check-post, and the amount collected was refundable to the applicant.