TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds jurisdiction to seal godown under Bengal Sales Tax Act</h1> The Tribunal held that the Commercial Tax Officer had jurisdiction to seal the godown under section 14(5) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The ... - Issues:Jurisdiction of the High Court under the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 and Article 323-B of the Constitution of India, Seizure of documents and sealing of godown, Retention of seized documents beyond one year under section 14(3A) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, Jurisdiction of the Commercial Tax Officer to seal the godown under section 14(5) of the 1941 Act.Analysis:The case involves an application challenging the seizure of documents and sealing of a godown under the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 and Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, barring the High Court. Another application was filed concerning the retention of seized documents beyond one year, which was previously decided by the Tribunal, directing the return of the documents to the applicant.Regarding the jurisdiction of the Commercial Tax Officer to seal the godown under section 14(5) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, the applicant argued that the officer was not a delegated authority of the Commissioner as required by rule 71 of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941. However, the State Representative contended that the legislation conferred powers on officers appointed under section 3(1) to assist the Commissioner, including the Commercial Tax Officer. The Tribunal concurred with the State Representative, holding that the officer had jurisdiction to seal the godown.As the godown had been unsealed, and the goods were left in the custody of the applicant, no further relief was necessary for the goods. The Tribunal directed the adjustment of the security deposit made by the applicant against future assessments. Additionally, the respondents were instructed to issue road permits and declaration forms in accordance with the law, with reasoned orders in case of rejection of any application.The main application was disposed of with no order for costs, concluding the proceedings before the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
