Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notices calling upon registered dealers to show cause for furnishing additional security under section 12 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 read with rule 28 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 were invalid for want of sufficient reasons or for arbitrariness and vagueness.
Analysis: The power to require additional security under section 12(10) is meant to secure proper realisation of tax and other dues and the proper custody and use of forms. Before an order is made, section 12(11) requires an opportunity of being heard and the authority must record reasons. At the stage of a show cause notice, however, it is enough if the notice indicates the basis on which additional security is proposed. The reference to increased volume of business was not irrelevant to the statutory purpose, and the sufficiency or legality of the reasons was a matter for consideration after objections were filed and an order was passed.
Conclusion: The notices were not invalid or arbitrary at the show cause stage, and the writ petitions were not liable to be admitted.