Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice demanding additional security under section 12(2) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act could be sustained when the relevant assessments had already been completed and no reassessment proceedings had been initiated by the competent authority.
Analysis: The demand notice proceeded on the footing of alleged tax evasion for the assessment years already completed. The record showed that no reassessment proceedings had been commenced by the competent Commercial Tax Officer, and the officer who issued the notice was not the authority competent to initiate such proceedings. In these circumstances, calling upon the assessee to furnish additional security served no legal purpose, because the assessments had attained completion and the foundation for further action was absent.
Conclusion: The demand notice was not sustainable and the challenge to it succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to relief, and all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned demand notice were restrained.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand for additional security cannot be sustained where the assessments have already been completed and no reassessment proceedings have been validly initiated by the authority competent to do so.