Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed in the seizure case under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 required further reduction for want of intention to evade tax.
Analysis: The application was under section 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987. The challenge to the seizure itself was not pressed. On the materials produced, the applicant had been making inquiries about the procedure for import under the 1954 Act, had approached the competent authority for a permit on the date of seizure, and had deposited advance tax shortly thereafter for issuance of the permit. These facts showed that the applicant was not acting with the requisite intention to evade tax. The penalty, though already reduced in revision, was therefore excessive in the circumstances.
Conclusion: The penalty was further reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 15,000 and the excess amount was directed to be refunded. The advance tax deposit was directed to be adjusted in the relevant assessment.