Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commercial Tax Officer was justified in initiating coercive recovery proceedings and retaining tax collections despite the petitioner's temporary eligibility certificate for sales tax exemption, and whether refund with interest was warranted.
Analysis: The guidelines governing implementation of the incentive scheme provided that, on issuance of a temporary eligibility certificate, the concerned industry was entitled to sales tax exemption and the Commercial Tax Officer was required to allow the exemption and adjust the amount in the final eligibility certificate. The officer ignored the temporary eligibility certificate, recovered the tax coercively, and did not correct the mistake when refund was sought. The reasons later advanced to justify the recovery, namely alleged non-utilisation of the amount for industrial development and alleged closure of the unit, were treated as irrelevant to the legality of the earlier recovery and refund refusal.
Conclusion: The recovery was held to be illegal, arbitrary, and high-handed, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of the recovered tax with interest at 12% per annum from the dates of recovery until repayment.