Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transaction for supply, erection and installation of plastic machinery was a works contract or a sale within the meaning of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The decisive inquiry was the true nature of the contract as gathered from its terms and the surrounding circumstances. The price was inclusive of erection and commissioning, and the machinery could not be treated as a completed commercial article until the component parts were assembled, installed, tested and commissioned at the customer's site. The Court applied the settled distinction between a contract for sale and a contract for work, holding that where the dominant object is execution of work and installation, and the materials supplied are only part of that integrated process, the transaction is a works contract. The presence of clauses relating to insurance or sales tax was held not to alter the essential character of the bargain.
Conclusion: The transaction was a works contract and not a sale.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the contract was not exigible as a sale of goods, and the Revenue's contention failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A contract for supply, erection and installation is a works contract where the installation and commissioning are integral to the completion of the subject-matter and no independent sale of goods as chattels can be identified.