Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a mandamus directing the assessing authority to give effect to the appellate tribunal's order and refund the amount due with interest under the applicable sales tax provisions.
Analysis: The appellate tribunal had already granted relief and set aside the penalty, but the authority had not passed consequential orders or issued the refund. The statutory scheme under the sales tax provisions placed a duty on the authority to make the consequential refund within the prescribed time. Where refund was delayed beyond the statutory period, interest at 12% per annum became payable. The plea that refund should be made only on furnishing security was rejected because the department had not obtained any stay of refund under the relevant provision and could not otherwise obstruct compliance with the tribunal's order.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the writ relief, and the authority was directed to make the refund with 12% interest per annum within four weeks.
Ratio Decidendi: When an appellate order granting tax relief becomes operative and no statutory stay of refund has been obtained, the assessing authority must give effect to the order and pay the refund within the prescribed time, failing which statutory interest follows.