Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the scheme of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, the Revenue could proceed to complete the final assessment under the proviso to rule 21(13) when no separate final order had been passed on the provisional assessments under rule 21(8), (9) or (10).
Analysis: The assessment scheme provided two alternative methods: an advance assessment for the whole year under rule 18, and a monthly return-based self-assessment under rule 21. Where the assessee adopted the rule 21 method, the returns were to be filed month by month and, after the year ended, an annual return was required to be scrutinised before final orders were passed under the proviso to rule 21(13). The authority was therefore entitled to require production of accounts and other relevant materials for completing that final assessment. The absence of a separate final order on provisional assessments under sub-rules (8) to (10) did not prevent action under the proviso to rule 21(13).
Conclusion: The objection had no legal foundation and was rejected.