Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 16(1)(b) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 could be imposed for failure to deposit tax within the prescribed period even though the tax had not yet been ascertained or assessed.
Analysis: The liability provision was amended in 1964. Before amendment, penalty was attracted where the dealer had, without reasonable cause, failed to pay tax due within the time allowed. After amendment, the language extended to failure to pay within the time allowed any tax, fee or penalty. The earlier Supreme Court ruling concerned the pre-amendment wording and therefore did not govern the amended provision. Under the amended text, liability to penalty arises from failure to pay within time, and it is not necessary that the tax must already have been assessed as due.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 16(1)(b) was legally leviable, and the order sustaining the penalty was correct.
Ratio Decidendi: After the 1964 amendment to section 16(1)(b) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, failure to pay tax within the time allowed attracts penalty even if the tax has not yet been formally assessed or ascertained as due.