Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether formaldehyde used in the manufacture of plywood was a component part of plywood and, if identifiable by chemical test, entitled to concessional purchase under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The exemption and concessional rate depended on whether the article purchased formed an identifiable constituent of the finished product. The material on record, including affidavits of technical experts, showed that formaldehyde was mixed in the manufacturing process and could be identified in the finished product by chemical analysis. The controlling principle was that visual identification was not necessary where the nature of the product and the process permitted identification by chemical or other appropriate test. The revisional authority applied an incorrect test in treating formaldehyde as merely a remote ingredient and in ignoring the evidence placed by the appellant.
Conclusion: Formaldehyde was held to be an identifiable component part of plywood, and the revisional order was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, and the assessee's entitlement to the concessional treatment was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: An article is a component part for concessional sales tax purposes if it forms an identifiable constituent of the finished product, and such identification may be established by chemical test even where it is not visually discernible.