Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer carrying on hotel business along with other businesses could confine the benefit of composition under section 17(4) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 only to the turnover of the hotel business.
Analysis: Section 17(4) permits composition for a hotelier or restaurateur, but the explanation to section 17 defines "total turnover" as the aggregate turnover in respect of all goods of a dealer at all places of business in the State, whether or not the whole or any portion of such turnover is liable to tax. On that definition, the turnover of all businesses carried on by the dealer must be taken together. The provision does not permit composition to be isolated only to the hotel activity when the same dealer conducts additional businesses. The Act also contemplates a single registration for a dealer carrying on several businesses.
Conclusion: The benefit of composition under section 17(4) could not be restricted to the hotel business alone, and the petitioner was not entitled to the relief claimed.