Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents could retain the seized records and documents beyond the period prescribed under section 41(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, and whether the petitioner was entitled to release of all seized documents except those required for the criminal investigation and trial.
Analysis: The seizure arose out of a search of the petitioner's business premises and residence. The statutory scheme under section 41(3), as amended, required seized records and documents to be returned after thirty days, or after ninety days where approval of the next higher authority had been obtained. The Court found no justification for continued retention of the seized documents beyond the maximum period contemplated by the proviso. At the same time, the petitioner accepted the Magistrate's direction in respect of the two documents specifically required for the investigation and any criminal trial.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to release of all seized documents forthwith, except item 11(b) under the mahazar and the 'XX' book under D7 slip, which were left to be dealt with in accordance with the Magistrate's order.