Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an eligibility certificate granted for an earlier period could be cancelled on the basis of subsequent , and whether the impugned orders cancelling the certificate were liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The application was under section 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 and also sought renewal of the eligibility certificate for later years under rule 3(66a) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941. The decisive fact was that the certificate granted for the period from 16 March 1984 to 31 March 1984 had been cancelled on the basis of happenings in July 1987. Such later events could not legally furnish a basis for cancelling a certificate relating to an earlier and completed period. The Tribunal therefore found that the impugned orders could not stand, without entering into the other factual controversies raised by the parties.
Conclusion: The cancellation of the eligibility certificate for the March 1984 period was invalid and the impugned orders were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An eligibility certificate granted for a concluded earlier period cannot be cancelled on the basis of subsequent events occurring long after that period.