Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the doctrine of ejusdem generis applied to entry 40 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 so as to restrict sub-entry (v) and exclude thermofoam from single-point taxation.
Analysis: Entry 40, as introduced from 13 November 1974, contained distinct items such as sheets, cushions, pillows and mattresses, followed by the wider expressions "other articles made of foam rubber, plastic foam or other synthetic foam". The Court held that the items in the entry did not form a single, clearly ascertainable genus. In particular, "sheets" could not be clubbed with cushions, pillows and mattresses to create one common class of goods used for rest and comfort. Since a distinct category was not established, the doctrine of ejusdem generis could not be applied to narrow the scope of the general words. The product marketed as thermofoam, on the materials placed before the Court, fell within the wide language of the entry and in any event within the residuary words "other synthetic foam".
Conclusion: The doctrine of ejusdem generis did not apply to entry 40, and thermofoam was taxable under sub-entry (v) and the residuary words of the entry.
Final Conclusion: The revenue succeeded in the connected revision, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Ejusdem generis can restrict general words only when the specific words disclose a clear genus or category; where no such genus is identifiable, the general words must receive their full ordinary meaning.