Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 could be recovered from the dealer when the admitted tax was tendered by cheque within time, the cheque was received by the department, but it was not presented for encashment and was never shown to have been dishonoured.
Analysis: The tax regulations permitted payment of admitted tax by cheque along with the return. The receipt issued by the department and the contemporaneous correspondence showed that the cheque had been deposited. Once a cheque is accepted as a mode of payment, it operates as payment unless dishonoured. The cheque here was not shown to have been dishonoured, and the delay in realising its proceeds was attributable to the department rather than to the dealer. Interest for delayed payment can be levied only where the default is attributable to the assessee.
Conclusion: Interest was not recoverable from the assessee, and the demand and recovery proceedings could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, and the impugned interest demand was set aside because the admitted tax had been validly tendered within time by cheque and the subsequent non-realisation was due to departmental inaction.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a cheque tendered in payment of admitted tax is accepted by the department and is not shown to have been dishonoured, non-presentation or non-encashment of the cheque by the department cannot be treated as a default by the assessee for the purpose of levying interest.