Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 was chargeable when the tax amount was tendered by cheque within time under rule 48(b) of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules, 1948, but the department did not present the cheque for encashment.
Analysis: The payment was admittedly received by the department within the prescribed time. The governing principle applied was that liability for interest arises only when the default in payment is attributable to the assessee. Where a cheque is duly tendered in time and the department fails to present it for collection, the assessee cannot be treated as being in default merely because the cheque was not encashed. On the facts, the delay in realisation was not attributable to the petitioners.
Conclusion: Interest was not chargeable under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, and the recovery proceedings for the assessment year 1975-76 were quashed in favour of the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest for delayed payment cannot be levied where the assessee has tendered payment in time by cheque and the non-realisation is due to the department's failure to present the cheque, since default must be attributable to the assessee.