Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 13-B of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and rule 56-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 authorized a blanket demand for monthly returns from a scheduled bank in relation to all dealers in a circle, and whether the impugned order was liable to be quashed as violative of section 13-B and article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: Section 13-B enabled the assessing authority to call for monthly returns from a scheduled bank only for information connected with a dealer and a particular assessment. The provision did not confer a general power to require a bank to furnish particulars of all dealers across an entire circle. Read with rule 56-A, the provision was treated as a limited procedural aid to assessment and not as an unreasonable restriction. The impugned order, however, did not identify any dealer and proceeded on a blanket basis, which exceeded the statutory scheme and could not be supported under section 13-B.
Conclusion: The impugned order was beyond the scope of section 13-B and was rightly quashed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, and the bank obtained relief against the impugned demand for returns.
Ratio Decidendi: A power to call for returns from a bank under a sales tax statute is confined to information relating to a specified dealer or assessment and does not authorize a blanket requisition covering all dealers in a circle.