Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods seized at a sales tax check-post could be detained and security insisted upon when the alleged undervaluation was found to be less than 50 per cent of the market value, in the light of the applicable departmental circular.
Analysis: The goods were seized under section 28-A(6) read with section 13-A(6) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 on the allegation of undervaluation. On the assessee's representation, the Assistant Commissioner revalued the goods and found that the undervaluation was less than 50 per cent of the market value. The departmental circular dated 13 April 1989 stated that, even where there was a contravention of those provisions, seizure was not required if the undervaluation was below 50 per cent of market value and the goods could be released after taking samples. The recorded finding brought the case within that circular.
Conclusion: The seizure and the demand for security were not justified, and the goods were required to be released after taking samples.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent that the seizure order was set aside insofar as it required security and the authorities were directed to release the goods in accordance with the circular.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the admitted factual finding shows that the undervaluation is below the prescribed threshold in the governing circular, the authorities cannot insist on seizure or security contrary to that circular.