Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under rule 31 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, the assessee could be required to have the personal security offered on its behalf considered by the assessing authority, and whether interim protection should be granted pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: Rule 31 permits an assessee to furnish personal or property security. The refusal to even examine the security bond offered on behalf of the assessee was therefore not justified. Since the main appeal was pending and related to the assessment year in question, the matter called for prompt disposal of the appeal and protection against coercive recovery until then.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to consideration of the security offered, the authority was directed to dispose of the appeal within the stipulated time, and collection of the demand was stayed till then.