Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the forms appended to Notification No. 966-655-V-ST dated March 28, 1969, could be produced at a later stage notwithstanding the bar against additional evidence under section 39-A of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: A notification published in the Official Gazette is not factual evidence but part of the law operating in the relevant field. A statutory instrument having the force of law cannot be equated with oral or documentary additional evidence within the meaning of section 39-A. The notification, and the forms appended to it, were therefore required to be taken into account by the appellate authority and the Tribunal. The statutory bar against additional evidence was held inapplicable to such a legal instrument.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative. The Tribunal was justified in taking notice of the notification and its appended forms, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A notification published in the Official Gazette and having the force of law is not additional evidence, and therefore its production or reliance upon is not barred by provisions restricting additional evidence at appellate or revisional stages.