Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rice bran fell within the expression "husk of all grains, cereals, pulses and rice" in the exemption notification dated 1 April 1982 and was therefore exempt from sales tax.
Analysis: The expression "husk" was construed in its ordinary commercial and dictionary sense. Rice bran was held to be distinct from husk, since bran is obtained during polishing of the grain and is not a product of stalk, leaves, or husk. The earlier notification of 7 April 1967 separately mentioned "bran" in addition to "husk", showing that bran was not treated as husk. The withdrawal of the separate exemption for bran in the later notification indicated that the later notification did not intend to extend exemption to rice bran.
Conclusion: Rice bran was not exempt under the notification and the challenge to the assessment order failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was rejected because the impugned orders correctly held that rice bran did not fall within the exempted category of husk.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption purposes, tax notifications must be read according to the ordinary commercial meaning of the goods described, and a commodity separately identified in an earlier notification is not treated as included within a broader exempted category unless the notification clearly so provides.