Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rice bran fell within the term "bhusi" in the sales tax exemption notification, and whether the earlier exemption notification continued to exempt rice bran.
Analysis: The notification exempted cattle fodder and included specified items such as bhusi, chhilka, chokar, cotton seed, gowar and oil-cake. Rice bran was held not to be bhusi in common parlance, as bhusa and bhusi denote commodities obtained from stalk, leaves and husk of grains, whereas rice bran was not such a commodity. The wider contention that rice bran was cattle fodder as such was not the question referred for opinion and could not be used to enlarge the reference. The earlier 1948 exemption notification was also found to have been superseded by the later notification of 31 March 1956, which made only the goods in List II exempt from tax.
Conclusion: Rice bran was not exempt as bhusi under the notification, and the earlier exemption notification did not continue to protect it.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee and in favour of the department.
Ratio Decidendi: A commodity claimed to be exempt under an inclusive exemption entry must satisfy the ordinary meaning of the relevant exempted category, and a prior exemption notification stands displaced where a later notification restricts exemption to the goods expressly listed.