Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned demand notices were liable to be withdrawn and the petitioner's tax liability re-examined after hearing, without adjudicating the challenge to the validity of the proviso to section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The parties agreed that the writ petition should be disposed of on the same terms as similar writ petitions decided earlier. Following that course, the Court directed that the impugned demand notices be withdrawn and that the concerned authority re-examine the matter and determine the petitioner's liability, if any, after giving an opportunity of hearing. The validity of the impugned proviso was not decided.
Conclusion: The demand notices stood withdrawn and the matter was sent back for fresh determination of liability after hearing the petitioner.