Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty paid on HSD oil, which is not covered as an input under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, could be treated as eligible credit so as to permit refund when the assessee was unable to utilise it.
Analysis: The cited circular and notification concerned utilisation of Cenvat credit by 100% EOUs and refund of credit that could not be utilised. Such refund presupposes that the assessee is first entitled to take the credit. Since HSD oil was found not to be covered as an input under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, no credit could be availed in the first place. In that situation, neither utilisation nor refund of such credit could arise.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable and the lower appellate authority's order was upheld.