Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable under Rule 12 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when the capital goods were received in the factory, credit was initially taken and utilised, and the credit was later reversed on detection of shortage.
Analysis: The liability to recover interest under Rule 12 arises only when Cenvat credit has been taken or utilised wrongly. On the admitted facts, the capital goods had been received in the factory and the credit had been validly taken at the time of receipt. The Revenue did not establish that the goods had never been received or that the credit was otherwise wrongly availed or utilised. In those circumstances, Rule 12 was not attracted. Since Rule 14 contains an identical scheme, the same conclusion applied there as well. Once the recovery provisions under Rule 12 or Rule 14 were inapplicable, there was no occasion to sustain interest under Section 11AB.
Conclusion: Interest was not recoverable under Rule 12 or Rule 14, and the demand of interest was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the interest demand was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest under the Cenvat Credit recovery provisions is chargeable only where credit has been taken or utilised wrongly; where credit was validly taken on receipt of goods and wrongful availment is not established, interest cannot be levied.