TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellant wins appeal on duty for unbranded goods</h1> <h3>PRESIDENT GLASS WORKS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR </h3> The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal concerning duty on unbranded goods. It was held that the absence of a brand name and ... - The appeal was made regarding the levy of duty on unbranded goods. The appellant argued that since the goods did not carry any brand name and no evidence of branding was found, duty should not be imposed. The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, stating that the invoices showing the brand name were not conclusive proof. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
